
...
More
On Mainstream Modernist Painting
and
The New New
|
XXXXXThere
are already a distinguished group of art professionals who agree
that the New New are a distinct and exciting, new movement. The dealer,
André Emmerich, the collector Lewis Cabot,
and the art historian, William Agee, are three examples. Others
include the American critics Donald Kuspit, David Carrier, Arelene
Raven; the Canadian critics Ken Carpenter, the Belgian critic
Marcel Paquet, as well the museum directors and curators here
and abroad who have selected the New New group for exhibition.
Three collectors have built large collections of their work.
XXXXX There are good painters who have
not yet been exhibited with the New New but whose work relates to
theirs in sensibility, if not yet in focus and consistency: American
painters, Gorden Terry and David Reed; the Canadian painters Neil
Marshall, Clay Ellis, Bill Kort, and Giuseppe Albi, as well as the
Irish painter Declan O’Mahoney. All have been influenced by
New New.
XXXXX There are pictures by Walter Darby
Bannard and Dan Christensen, which would also look at home in a New
New exhibition. So would Jules Olitski’s paintings done on
mirrored plexi, which he did shortly after visiting Lucy Baker’s
studio in 1986. Olitski’s recent style follows New New in many
respects while retaining his own voice, tonalities, and color. Ann
Walsh’s new painted reliefs also have a New New flair about
them.
XXXXXThe New New are the most vital
and audacious members of a much larger group which might be called
the
third generation or wave of Color Field painters. All came along
since the 70’s. The centers for this work are New York, Syracuse,
Toronto, Edmonton, Paris and London. I showed a group of these painters
back in 1980, in a exhibition at the André Emmerich Gallery,
called “The New Generation”. Aside from the New New,
this group has not yet equalled or gone beyond their mentors – Olitski,
Noland and Poons – in any fundamental way. Nonetheless, many
of them produce, or have produced, some wonderful paintings: Darryl
Hughto, Susan Roth, James Walsh, Peter Bradley, Robert Scott, James
Hendricks, Sandi Sloan, John Hoyland, John MacLean, John Griefen,
Pat Lipsky, Jill Nathenson, Larry Zox, Molly Morris, Stephen Achimore,
Scott Bennet, Mark Raush, Olivier Dubre, Jean Miotte, Lauren Olitski,
Ronnie Landfield, Sheila Gehrling,
Harold
Feist, Frank Bowling, Francine Tint, Terry Keller, Mitch Smith, Doug
Haynes, Jeremy Down, Kikuo Saito, Jiri Malik, Randi Bloom, Michael
Williams, Paula DeLuccia and Joseph Marioni. There are doubtless
many others who I am unaware of or am leaving out. Taken together
with the New New, this is a very large group. The official New York
art world doesn’t yet register it at all, yet it must be called
painting’s Modernist Mainsteam.
|
XXXXXVery
often, Modernism can be described as the creative use of new
technologies. One only has
to think of Modern Architecture, Modern Sculpture or Modern Music.
As regards to painting, the heavier oils (like poppy seed oil),
and tube pigments, which came into use in the 19th century, were
essential for the Impressionists and Post Impressionists painters.
Crucial to the second generation of Color Field painters (Morris
Louis, Kenneth Noland, Jules Olitski, Helen Frankenthaler, Friedel
Dzubas, Jack Bush and others) was acrylic, water based, plastic
paint which became commercially available in the late fifties.
Pollock and others already had pushed painting beyond the limits
of oil paint and had turned to industrial paints, Duco enamels
and aluminum paint, to get greater fluidity and more optical
effects. The fragility of his pictures today, and those of many
members of his generation, is testimony to a frustration with
the limits of the oil medium and a search for alternatives. Most
of the Color Field painters stained thinned paint into untreated
canvas. They did this to neutralize texture and so present pure,
optical color as the primary bearer feeling. But oil paint is
difficult to thin down, and no matter how thin, it eventually
attacks the canvas fibers if stained directly into them. This
is why, since the beginning of oil painting in the 16th century,
painters prepared the surface of their canvas with a “sizing”,
usually of rabbit skin glue, before beginning to paint. Water
based acrylic paint automatically solved this problem while,
simultaneously, offering a fluid friendly, quick drying medium
with an entirely new palette of brilliant colors. It seemed made
to order for the Color Field painters. And indeed, the leading
manufacturer of the new acrylics, Leonard Bocour and his chemist
Sam Golden, worked closely with the painters, beginning with
Morris Louis, to develop the new medium.
XXXXThe
New New painters have continued this creative dialogue with
the paint chemist, Sam Golden (who died in 1997) and his son
Mark. The development of acrylic paint and avant garde painting
continue to go hand and hand. The most important invention
in the eighties was a completely clarified gel, a thickening
and extending agent. This made acrylics a full bodied medium,
like oils, but capable of thicker imposto, brighter color and
clearer transparency. Gel can also act as a kind of glue or
sealer permitting painters to fold additives like plastic foam
into the body of their pictures. This has made possible the
sculpture punch of the New New. And rather than using acrylics
as a more convenient way to achieve effects possible in oils,
the New New painters features acrylics’ distinctly plastic
look and feel. Also they and other painters have played an
essential role in the creation of many new types of paint:
metallic paint (gold, silver, copper, aluminum), glitter paint,
hologram paint, pearlescent paint, cement like (but lightweight)
pumice paint, iridescent, “interference” paint,
multi-layered “panspectra” paint, protective varnish
for fluorescent paint and more. Although, dramatically increasing
painting’s range of effects, many of these are wholly
unreproducible. The dazzling newness of the New New is badly
compromised in photographs and reproductions.
XXXXOf
course, none of the above should be taken to mean that oil, enamel,
fresco, tempera, or any other painting medium is outdated. But it
does mean that acrylics and Pollock-type painting seem uniquely compatible.
Most members of Pollock’s own generation quickly switched to
acrylics when they became available. This is the biggest change in
the medium of painting since the 16th century.
XXXXAll
this demonstrates how very misleading the notion of “Postmodernism” is.
Stimulated by new technology, artists create new mediums and revolutionize
traditional ones. This process is ongoing and will not stop anytime
soon. The worlds most visible architect, Frank Gehry, is a Modernist
in this sense and so are our most celebrated sculptors: Richard
Serra and Frank Stella. Color Field and New New are not yet celebrated,
but they too are Modernist in the above sense, and have been all
along.
|
|
|
|
| |
|