|
|
Bruce
Piermarini
|
"Hatred",
2000, 84" x 84" |

|
|
|
Dear
Artlover,
XXXXXThe
vanguard critic is presumptive enough
to think that his vision will be
the truth of the future. He finds
himself cast as a prophet. The works
of certain artists have astonished
him and he must spread the word.
I challenge you, the visitor to this
site, with my belief that if I can
show you my truth about art, it can
forever change the way you see the
rest of contemporary art, and I am
inviting you to come to my home and
see for yourself.
|
|
|
| XXXXXMoffett’s
Artletter 2.0 is both this invitation and an online journal
of my art opinions. I hold a PhD. in Art History and am a former
professor, curator, and museum director. (See biography.) Moffett’s
Art Letter 2.0 is an updated version of Moffett’s Artletter,
which I published from 1987 to 1989. Both offer my vision of
contemporary painting and sculpture. Most of all, I want to
point out who I think the greatest geniuses are, and where
the Modernist Mainstream is. |
XXXXXOutside New York, heroic Modernism has been born again.
Over the past 20 years, a bold new generation of creative individuals
and a new technology, have produced a brand new Modernist painting.
This would be the new acrylic paintings of the so-called “New
New” painters. Their pictures are stunningly original, visually
dazzling and vibrantly alive. Here is the most exciting group of
painters to come along since the New York School. The New New consists
of Lucy Baker, Steve Brent, Joseph Drapell, John Gittins, Roy Lerner,
Anne Low, Marjorie Minkin, Irene Neal, Gérard Paire, Graham
Peacock, Bruce Piermarini and Jerald Webster. Their number and
influence continue to grow. The New New have had over 25 shows
together at venues in the United States, as well as in Canada,
France, Germany, Belgium and even Korea. They have had 10 museum
shows. In 1993, they were given a large exhibition at the Museé d’Art
Modern et d’Art Contemporian in Nice. In 2000, they were
shown at the Hotel de Ville in Brussels, and last year they were
given a major show at the National Gallery of the Czech Republic
in Prague.
|
|
|
Lucy
Baker 1984,
On Plexi
|
XXXXXBut a large, vital, Modernist Movement with a new vision
of painting, does not fit New York’s market-driven, Post
Modernist paradigm. So you cannot see the New New in New York’s
museums or elite commercial galleries. It is a scandal, but it
is true. For all of its resources and sophistication, New York
has become provincial when it comes to Mainstream Modernist painting. |
XXXXXWhere then to see the New New? Make no mistake, New
New must be seen in the flesh, up close and personal. Those who
know New New work in reproduction are amazed by its visual vitality
when they finally see the originals. |
..........I have assembled the New New Collection, a representative
collection of New New paintings in my home in Stamford, Connecticut,
and I am inviting you, the visitor to this site, to come and see
it. I believe that you will find the collection exhilarating and
mind expanding. It is the only place in the New York metropolitan
area where you can see New New. It joins the Museum of New New
painting in Toronto, founded by Joseph Drapell and Anna MacLachlan
in 2001, as an ongoing showcase for New New painting. |
|
|
John
Gittins, Roy Lerner, and Marjorie Minkin
|
| iXXXXXStamford
is 50 minutes by train from N.Y.C. and easily accessible by
car. The collection contains over 70 works, some quite large.
In addition to New New paintings, there are also outstanding
examples of Color Field paintings by Jules Olitski, Kenneth
Noland, Fridel Dzubas, Jack Bush and Larry Poons, masters on
whose shoulders the New New stand. I give a tour of about 1
hour, on Saturdays at 11:00AM or by appointment. Places are
limited so you must call to make a reservation (203-356-9573).
The tour is free and without obligation of any kind. (See link
for directions.) |
Joseph
Drapell, "Meditative", 2003, 60" x
40"
|
|
|
| |
The
New New Group
XXXXXThe
English art historian, Alan Bowness, has written that “most
truly original new art is the result of group activity.
It appears that the conjunction of several exceptional
talents results in something that is greater than the
parts”. This has been true throughout history and
especially in modern times, when a group of artists with
a shared new vision, often find themselves isolated outside
the official art world. Under these conditions, a group
provides confirmation, inspiration, competition (maintaining
level), the sharing of technical information, and exhibition
opportunities. New York’s official art world should
ponder why it is that the New New is the only such avant
garde group on the scene today.
XXXXXThe name “New
New Painting” is meant in part ironically but
also seriously. It is a challenge and bespeaks a brassy
confidence. The New New have a New York attitude and
might be called the “New York School Outside
New York”. They are an international group of
individuals, most of whom are Americans, and all of
whom visit New York City often, but none of whom live
or work there. They live in towns in New England and
New York State, with individual members in Toronto,
Edmonton and Paris. Outside
New York, it is cheaper to live and one avoids becoming
part of the intense matrix that is New York and its
art world. One is more easily in touch with oneself.
Already with Pollock’s move to East Hampton in
1945, New York School painting, which was all about
getting and keeping in touch with oneself, felt more
at home outside New York City. This was repeated with
the Washington Color School and the group at Bennington
Vermont in the 1960’s and 1970’s. Although
scattered between France and Western Canada, the New
New are their own audience, like the original New York
School. Each is strongly independent and geographically
isolated. Ease
of travel and cyberspace lets painting's avant garde
exist today without urban watering holes like cafes
and bars.
|
|
|
The New New at The Flint Museum 1999
|
What
is New New Painting?
New
New painting can be said to spring from three sources:
1. All of the New New painters
see themselves as successors of Jackson Pollock
and The New York School: Abstract Expressionism
and Color Field painting. They see this as the
Modernist Mainstream, a continuous, self-aware, “tradition
of the new”, which began with Pollock and
has been unfolding over the last 60 years. Second
generation Colorfield painters and especially
Jules Olitski were the dominant figures, within
this tradition in the '70s, and early '80s, when
the New New were young artists searching for
themselves. Almost all of them had an early Olitski
- influenced phase. They worship Olitski as the
painter’s painter, the non plus ultra of
exquisite refinement and sublimity. They also
love Morris Louis’ passionate purity and
sweeping power as well as Kenneth Noland’s
bold, brilliant, pure color improvisations. They
have been inspired by Larry Poon’s indulgence
and audacity in handling the medium. Helen Frankenthaler,
Friedel Dzubus and Jack Bush were also among
their heroes. And they were confirmed by Walter
Darby Bannard, Dan Christensen, Peter Bradley,
Larry Zox, Ronnie Landfield, Jill Nathanson,
Sandi Slone, Darryl Hughto, Susan Roth and many
others.
It
is testimony to the largeness of Olitski’s art that
he dominated the Mainstream, New York School painting,
for so long. Only in 1982 did a challenger appear, one
who was strong enough, large enough, and unique enough,
to challenge Olitski and set Modernist painting on a new
course. This was Lucy Baker. Neither a pure colorist like
Noland, nor a pure painter like Olitski, she is an expressionist,
sculptor – draughtsman type, like Picasso, David
Smith or Pollock, who constantly returns to the human figure,
and who knows how to make paint serve the artistic will.
Baker electrifies Color Field with her ferocious drawing
even as she set gross physicality against its disembodied
opticality. Instead of a light and color inflected field,
there is a clash of extremes. Almost simultaneously, Baker’s
colleague, Graham Peacock, an Englishman living in Canada,
created his own version of pure color plus raw expressionism
and the New New was born.
|
|
|
Lucy
Baker , "El Nino", 1997, 53" x 94"
|
| 2.
The New New have been deeply involved with the extraordinary
technological development of acrylic paints and gels during
the past 25 years. Their love of the new medium energizes their
pictures. Their creative use of it was featured in a two part
article about acrylics in American Artists by Laurie S. Horwitz
which appeared in 1994. Acrylics enable the New New to recreate
a very contemporary visual world of feeling: distinctly plastic,
holographic, transparent, reflective, translucent, iridescent,
glitzy, glossy, and with lots of eye popping color. Their paintings
have the dark energy of our most passionate rockers (like Kurdt
Kobain) or fiercest rappers (like Eminem), but are far more
sublimated, thanks to the medium of painting, and an extravagant,
psychedelic sensuality made possible by the new plastic paints.
Perhaps the New New should be called “high tech Neo Expressionism” or “Graffiti
Art at a higher level” or “Punk meets Colorfield”. |
SSteve
Brent "Justice", 1997, 18"x27"x
6"
|
|
|
3. The New New all proclaim the spiritual meaning of Modernist
painting, as we find it proclaimed by Kandinsky,
Mondrian, Malevich and the earliest “Non-Objective” painters.
In a strictly personal way, the spiritual was also proclaimed
by Pollock and the first generation of the New York School,
most memorably by Barnett Newman, Clifford Still, and
Mark Rothko. The New New too, seek the sublime. They
too are shameless romantics. As the critic. Donald Kuspit
has written, the New New show “an unembarrassed
sense of soul.” “Above all”, he writes, “what
must be emphasized about the New New painters is their
painterly excess, even violence, with its virtually overwhelming
sense of erotic richness and fatal energy, bringing in
its wake a sense of sounding the depths of unconscious
emotion-or rather, of a sense of self we only become
fleetingly conscious of in ecstasy. They have broken
out of the sterile, depleted cul de sac of postpainterly
abstraction, bringing new life and intensity, depth and
energy..."
|
Graham
Peacock, "Euphrates Smiles", 2001-2003,
90"x43"x2"
|
|
|

Jerry
Webster , "Mountain Jig", 1990, 68 3/4"x47 1/2 "

Peter
G. Ray, "Maternity", 2004, 36" x 36"

Jerald
Webster, "Snow Queen",
Back
to the top of Page
|
|